A.
Find Out
1.
Who was Haman and what happened to him? v.1
2.
How did the royal officials respond to him? v.2a
3.
But how did Mordecai respond to him? v.2b
4.
Who asked what of Modecai and what did they do? v.3,4
5.
What did Haman feel about this? v.5
6.
So what did he plan to do? v.6
B.
Think:
1.
What does the elevating of Haman show about the king?
2.
What changes does this bring about, what consequences?
C.
Comment:
There are two mysteries here. The first is why Haman was promoted
and the second is why Mordecai refused to bow before him.
Haman is an Agagite. Now the only Scriptural link suggested is
that this means he was a descendant of Agag, the Amalakite king (1 Sam
15). God had told Saul to wipe out the Amalakites, centuries before.
Presumably some of Agag's family survived and a dynasty created. This
man is therefore an historical enemy of the Jews. When Haman is unaccountably
promoted and a command sent out to honour him, this seems the only accountable
reason for Mordecai's refusal to bow before him, because the Jews didn't
usually have a problem with bowing before kings.
The royal officials, at the gate where
they met outside the palace, ask Mordecai about his behaviour and he
explains that he is a Jew – and presumably about their history with
the Amalakites. The officials mischievously tell Haman to see what will
happen. Haman is furious and, as he thinks about the situation, he plans,
not merely to kill Mordecai but all of his people, the Jews, as well.
The long arm of hatred stretches down through history and Saul's failure
to obey God brings a long-term repercussion. Haman is out to balance
history. Israel wiped out his people, so he will wipe out the Jews now.
This historical linkage can be the only reason for the behaviour of
both men. The king has promoted a situation where historical hostility
rises to the surface.
D.
Application:
1.
Disobedience to God will always have repercussions.
2.
Time may pass, but the consequences will always arise.